Why does the US Army not use Ballistic Shields?
Ballistic shields are protective shields used by special forces and most military personnel to resist against ballistic attacks. In most developed countries, ballistic shields are heavily used by military personnel, SWAT teams and police officers. Overtime, they have become an essential equipment in prompt response as well as defence to situations which involve heavily armed individuals. These shields have proven very efficient in their various use scenarios and enjoy wide usage across continental borders.
However, a constant question which arises is rationale for the United States of America’s failure to implement it in their military equipment. Statistically, the United State of America’s army is renowned for its efficient and outstanding performance in several cases. It seems alien that such a remarkably vibrant army will neglect the use of ballistic shields.
A few reasons have been adduced for this. First is the fact that ballistic shields lose their edges in the battlefield, especially against peculiar enemies. The weighty size of and effect of carrying this shield is commensurate reduction in speed and mobility of a soldier. Soldiers cannot afford to let go of these vital qualities. The army upholds principles that encourage dodging bullets rather than blocking them off. Hence, soldiers in the United States Army are fortified with drab gear, ammunition, and a patriotic heart.
Another reason ballistic Shields are not utilized by the United States of America army is the fact that the army is often faced with unconventionally armed enemies. These enemies make use of high calibre rounds which can easily pierce ballistic shields including NIJ level IIIA and above. For instance, Islamic states seeking to impose and propagate their ideologies rarely use 9mm rounds but explosive devices buried underground which would effectively violate armour’s protection.
Furthermore, the United States army have a wide range of options available depending on the surrounding circumstances. For instance, where there are no hostages or prisoners of war, the military would resort to other means of heavy advancement such as an armored tank.
Check out the rest of our blog posts here.